Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

details:detailsofelements [2014/05/14 03:59] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== Elements for 'Details Of ...' ======
  
 +Recently Deborah found a set of (possible) sub-elements (about 50) that are not accounted for in the Toolkit Element Set View (ESV), or the OMR, or RIMMF. As she said in an email:
 + 
 +I'm doing an audio CD that is a "digitally mastered, analog recording". It is very messy to explain this using AACR/MARC, but once you know how, it can be done. 
 + 
 +In the RDA instructions, we have:
 +
 +  Type of Recording:     Digital    3.16.2
 + 
 +And then, under 3.16.2.4, Details of Type of Recording, we have a nice example: 
 +  "Made from an analog original".
 + 
 +But we have no *element* in which I can enter 'Details of Type of Recording'. And no note that could cover this type of thing (3.22.1) 
 + 
 +There are a large number (about 50) of instructions/elements in Ch. 3 and others in Ch. 7 that have a sub-instruction (sub-element?) beginning "Details of..."
 + 
 +There is still the question: how is this type information meant to be entered? I do not believe it can be entered in the same container as the 'parent', e.g.:
 +  Type of Recording:     Digital. Made from an analog original
 + 
 +Doing it that way, would mess up the pull-down vocabulary that has been provided for that element, and would interfere with the retrieval possibilities for that element.
 + 
 +Perhaps it should be something like this:
 + 
 +{{:details:details1.jpg|}}
 +
 +We have added these 'Details of' elements to RIMMF (in release 120904), as in the 'sub-element' example above. Perhaps in a future version we can improve on how things like this are handled.
details/detailsofelements.txt ยท Last modified: 2014/05/14 03:59 (external edit)
Back to top
CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported
Driven by DokuWiki Recent changes RSS feed